Thread: A good insight into recent (20 yr) history of armed policing (AOS) in NZ

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/secret...SEPNTEYQNVO2Y/

While I dont envy the job or task front line officers face, there are some glaring gaps & risks .... and cover ups.
For once, some half decent investigative journalism. Those clammering for full time arming of cops in NZ should read & digest.

After revelations that New Zealand police kill at 11 times the rate of officers in England and Wales, RNZ has obtained a secret IPCA report that sheds light on the way the Armed Offenders Squad operates and the questionable state of police firearms training.

Have just read it, not a nice read eh! And hasn't the firearms community been saying for years that the police need more training. And still Coster continues to cover arse.

Originally Posted by chainsaw

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/secret...SEPNTEYQNVO2Y/

While I dont envy the job or task front line officers face, there are some glaring gaps & risks .... and cover ups.
For once, some half decent investigative journalism. Those clammering for full time arming of cops in NZ should read & digest.

After revelations that New Zealand police kill at 11 times the rate of officers in England and Wales, RNZ has obtained a secret IPCA report that sheds light on the way the Armed Offenders Squad operates and the questionable state of police firearms training.

I noticed there’s no comparison with Mexico and other countries with similar numbers of police shootings…

And I wonder if there’s a link between the NZ shootings and the appalling NZ suicide rate?

How many of the shootings have been justified or unjustified? That’s the real question. If the shooting is justified then there shouldn’t be an issue?

I agree though that the more training anyone had with firearms the better.

I should add that the accidental shootings should never have happened. Not good at all.

Coster is right though ‘shooting to wound is just for the movies’
When your arse is puckering and somebody who wishes you harm is bearing down from less than 15 yards and waving the weapon he’s intending on using on you there’s not much opportunity to ‘shoot to wound’
Having said that: the Woodlands guy near Invercargill seems to be the recipient of a wounding shot, his lucky day or??

I do not envy the cops at all ------ But accidently shot someone in the back while he was on the ground in handcuffs. He survived because the cop had used the wrong ammo. Missed a person from 7 to 9 meters away killing a bystander and wounding another. Plus other things all covered up. This report is fucking disturbing and should be headline news. Guess it will all be licenced firearm owners fault in the end.

Originally Posted by chindit

I do not envy the cops at all ------ But accidently shot someone in the back while he was on the ground in handcuffs. He survived because the cop had used the wrong ammo. Missed a person from 7 to 9 meters away killing a bystander and wounding another. Plus other things all covered up. This report is fucking disturbing and should be headline news. Guess it will all be licenced firearm owners fault in the end.

It all comes down to training I guess?
Training constrained by a tight-arse budget no doubt.

@Sako851 the IPCA said that all shootings were justified (at the instance the officer shot them) but police tactics may have “caused” the shooting by escalating the confrontation.
One guy was bail checked numerous times a day, often during the night and early hours of the morning for about a month. He was always there and was not breaching bail conditions. Eventually the guy cracked and police shot him while he was carrying a slasher.

Originally Posted by stug

@Sako851 the IPCA said that all shootings were justified (at the instance the officer shot them) but police tactics may have “caused” the shooting by escalating the confrontation.
One guy was bail checked numerous times a day, often during the night and early hours of the morning for about a month. He was always there and was not breaching bail conditions. Eventually the guy cracked and police shot him while he was carrying a slasher.

This

Originally Posted by stug

@Sako851 the IPCA said that all shootings were justified (at the instance the officer shot them) but police tactics may have “caused” the shooting by escalating the confrontation.
One guy was bail checked numerous times a day, often during the night and early hours of the morning for about a month. He was always there and was not breaching bail conditions. Eventually the guy cracked and police shot him while he was carrying a slasher.

A friend ended up on 23 hrs and 59 minutes curfew a few years ago after he shagged a cops Mrs and got charged with something he didn't do.
Anyway he cracked with the police visits every morning at 5 am. Funny bastard didnt resort to violence but 'stropped himself up' and answered the door each morning naked with a hard on and " Is there something I can do for you officer"?

A number of points were interesting-

I agree that there is a need for armed officers (AOS ) on occasion, and I agree that the training is woefully inadequate. Accuracy and performance under pressure is mostly muscle memory and practise. And one week a year is not enough. Mind you, every other aspect of the funding is inadequate as well so fair is fair....Licensing admin is woefully under funded too- the only part that is not underfunded seems to be traffic policing

In those situations, marksmanship should not require concentration...there are other issues / dangers that require their immediate concentration in those situations. But shooting the perpetrator must be a last resort and not the first response...

Interesting comments about the hollow points, and on the face of it, it makes some sense when you consider an FMJ going through and hitting behind the target.....

And shooting to wound is not really possible. The reason they go for "the big bit" is if they get to a point where they have to shoot someone to incapacitate them, then a limb is a dodgy target....And if you hit a thigh or shoulder and get the artery- they will be dead anyway but will now have a chance to return fire before passing...result is dead cop as well...or bystander.

Originally Posted by timattalon

A number of points were interesting-

I agree that there is a need for armed officers (AOS ) on occasion, and I agree that the training is woefully inadequate. Accuracy and performance under pressure is mostly muscle memory and practise. And one week a year is not enough. Mind you, every other aspect of the funding is inadequate as well so fair is fair....Licensing admin is woefully under funded too- the only part that is not underfunded seems to be traffic policing

What's wrong with the amount of firearms training police have? They're highly trained individuals.

Originally Posted by Sasquatch

What's wrong with the amount of firearms training police have? They're highly trained individuals.


Attachment 193611



Attachment 193612

Looks like her finger is underneath the trigger guard, too far back to be inside the trigger guard as the trigger would be in the way, likely her middle finger.

I don't like the lantern. He always come across piss weak, but smug all at the same time.

Like most ( read ALL) of their training, Firearms is rushed through. Once upon a time Police college was something like 33 weeks. Now its less than half that.

Once again its the costs of it which limit the amount of training you get in a year.

Woefully inadequate.