Thread: TV3 & Guncity mistake

Originally Posted by stug

As much as i hate to say it, she would not have been found guilty at court. Even though she broke the law her intent was not criminal. And that is what the defence would have focussed on. I think though that should Tipple go ahead with his civil case he would win as the bar is lower for a civil conviction.

is intent knowlingly breaking the law for some spurious supposed public good/ratings?? i think yes?did she talk to her boss about doing this i imagine she had to clear it in this litigious scratch my back era??
would she have got a legal opinion in this day of arse covering?probably