Thread: TV3 & Guncity mistake

Originally Posted by Ranger 888

I sent this to the "NZ Herald" this morning: Last year HdPA contravened the Arms Act wilfully by using another person's firearms licence and false details in order to purchase a firearm, thus committing a criminal act. Her rationale was to expose a "loophole" in the firearms purchasing system. The Police decided not to lay charges against her. Recently a man obtained some firearms by forging a firearms licence and using incorrect forms. If he is apprehended and chooses to use the same defence as Heather (exposing a "loophole"), will the Police treat him similarly? I think not.

I may have missed the answer to this question somewhere in all the comments on this subject?? But: What was the "loophole" in the previous mail order procedure?????

F'kd if I could see one apart from forgery and impersonation of police arms office people!!!!! & other criminal PREMEDITATED acts.