Thread: First time reloading 270win

To the aficionados of Gods caliber. Have reached the point that I’m confident with my case sizing technique so on to powder charge. Starting with AR2209 (have W760 on hand as well) and an old box of projectiles pictured:



Probably start at 53gns up to max as per the the ADI manual for the 130gn Hornady SP??

Rifle is a Remington SS Mountain rebarreled with a standard profile REM barrel cut down to 22”.

Surprised at the hesitancy and apprehension I’ve had learning and applying this new skill. I have an adequate stock of a variety of components in case my rifle doesn’t like a particular brew and I’m not stuck waiting for alternatives so just have to crack on with it.
Any input would be much appreciated from the knowledgeable members that inhabit this space. Thank you.

Cheers, Sidetrack.

760 is a really easy powder to use...and those projectiles are going to be awesome..... far to good for just paper punching.

Originally Posted by Micky Duck

760 is a really easy powder to use...and those projectiles are going to be awesome..... far to good for just paper punching.

I agree. From what I have read, they were a great performer in their day. I have 122 of them so hoping they work out for this rifle and I’ll keep them for hunting only. W760 is listed as the equivalent of 2209 so same start charge weights?

Originally Posted by Sidetrack

I agree. From what I have read, they were a great performer in their day. I have 122 of them so hoping they work out for this rifle and I’ll keep them for hunting only. W760 is listed as the equivalent of 2209 so same start charge weights?

No, Winchester 760 is not the same as AR2209 - it requires its own data that you can find here:

https://www.hodgdonreloading.com/reloading-data-center

The various powder 'equivalence' charts floating about should have huge warnings attached to them that they do not imply any form of commonality or substitution between powders. The only thing the chart provides is an approximation of relative burning rate, but this is very subjective.

Ive never used 2209...... I used loads straight from manual back when used 760 for myself..RUMPYS ruger likes it but likes a mild load,not much above start load levels..... his rifle would NOT LIKE/HANDLE the loads mine digests.

I use 760 in 270 with 130gr. 2209 would be temp stable and generally a lower extreme spread than 760.
I'm not a good enough shot to benefit though I don't leave the ammo on the bench in the summer sun.

Superformance and AR2213SC are also good powders in the 270, as MD said those Noslars are a good bullet I used them in the old days, may. Still have some even.

While there different powders 54-55 gns with a 130 is normally the accuracy and velocity (3000 ish fps) load for a .270 win.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Did notice that chamber is tighter than the previous one so does that mean pressures are likely to be higher? The donor rifle hadn’t had more than 20 rounds through it. Maybe I’ll start at 52gns and move up in .3s which seems to be accepted practice.
Overly conscious of component waste so was going to start with groups of three then test with five if something looked promising or am I deluding myself and it’s a waste in the long run? And yes, the OCD is kicking in hard!!!

52gr 760 130gr set to mag length it just works

Originally Posted by Sidetrack

Did notice that chamber is tighter than the previous one so does that mean pressures are likely to be higher? The donor rifle hadn’t had more than 20 rounds through it. Maybe I’ll start at 52gns and move up in .3s which seems to be accepted practice.
Overly conscious of component waste so was going to start with groups of three then test with five if something looked promising or am I deluding myself and it’s a waste in the long run? And yes, the OCD is kicking in hard!!!

Chamber may appear tighter because your die is set for the previous rifle. Go back to basic's and set your resizing die so the your cases chamber "nicely". That may even mean you have to set the die right back to "cam over", may not, each chamber is different. Those Nosler projectiles should perform great, excellent old school projectile. All of the powders mentioned should work fine, dont over think it - Superformance, 760, 2213/4831, 2209. Looking forward to seeing the results.

Originally Posted by Husky1600

Chamber may appear tighter because your die is set for the previous rifle. Go back to basic's and set your resizing die so the your cases chamber "nicely". That may even mean you have to set the die right back to "cam over", may not, each chamber is different. Those Nosler projectiles should perform great, excellent old school projectile. All of the powders mentioned should work fine, dont over think it - Superformance, 760, 2213/4831, 2209. Looking forward to seeing the results.

Apologies, should have made myself clearer. This is my first time reloading ever. I had test chambered some rounds that had been reloaded for me for original barrel and found that the bolt wouldn’t close on the round so my assumption was a tighter chamber. Is that correct?

Originally Posted by Sidetrack

Apologies, should have made myself clearer. This is my first time reloading ever. I had test chambered some rounds that had been reloaded for me for original barrel and found that the bolt wouldn’t close on the round so my assumption was a tighter chamber. Is that correct?

Each rifle is different, tighter is probably the easiest way to describe it. Shouldn't affect pressure, but it does mean that your die has to be set to that rifle/chamber. Easy to follow instructions in the first part of your reloading manual. If you want to load for several rifles or just go back to basic's, put your shell holder in to the press and then push the handle down which should put your ram to the top. Then screw your reloading die down until it contacts the shell holder. Pull the lever up, which drops the ram and screw in your die another 1/8 of a turn. Usually pays to lock your lock ring on the die at this point. Then push the handle back down and your ram/shell holder will come up to contact the bottom of the die and need just a slight "cam over" on your handle to be at the full length resizing setting.
Try a couple of cartridges to make sure its all good, and then try to chamber them in the rifle. I find it easier to fit a projectile in the EMPTY case to make it feed properly. If it feeds nice and chamber doesnt feel "tight" then you're all good to go.
Once you get yourself all good and deep down the proverbial rabbit hole of reloading you might want to play with that resizing depth for the minimal resizing depth so that it doesnt resize the case as much. But a FL resize doesnt have that much to do with the overall accuracy of your cartridges at this point.
The 270 is very tolerant to reload and you shouldn't have much problem finding a load to suit. If the 130's dont do what you expect then change to 140's and see if they are better.

Originally Posted by Husky1600

Each rifle is different, tighter is probably the easiest way to describe it. Shouldn't affect pressure, but it does mean that your die has to be set to that rifle/chamber. Easy to follow instructions in the first part of your reloading manual. If you want to load for several rifles or just go back to basic's, put your shell holder in to the press and then push the handle down which should put your ram to the top. Then screw your reloading die down until it contacts the shell holder. Pull the lever up, which drops the ram and screw in your die another 1/8 of a turn. Usually pays to lock your lock ring on the die at this point. Then push the handle back down and your ram/shell holder will come up to contact the bottom of the die and need just a slight "cam over" on your handle to be at the full length resizing setting.
Try a couple of cartridges to make sure its all good, and then try to chamber them in the rifle. I find it easier to fit a projectile in the EMPTY case to make it feed properly. If it feeds nice and chamber doesnt feel "tight" then you're all good to go.
Once you get yourself all good and deep down the proverbial rabbit hole of reloading you might want to play with that resizing depth for the minimal resizing depth so that it doesnt resize the case as much. But a FL resize doesnt have that much to do with the overall accuracy of your cartridges at this point.
The 270 is very tolerant to reload and you shouldn't have much problem finding a load to suit. If the 130's dont do what you expect then change to 140's and see if they are better.

Great, thanks for the reassurance. I’m trying not to over think it initially while still making sure I develop a deeper understanding of the process. I chose my 270 to start with as I have been shooting one for 45+ years, it’s only the second one I’ve owned so I’m very comfortable with it. As soon as the first SS Mountain rifle came on the market I traded out my Ruger M77 for one. I was hunting a lot in Fiordland by then so it made perfect sense.
It’s a fascinating process and I’d planned from the get go to take it up after I retired so as keep my brain stimulated. It certainly has done that!!

Originally Posted by Sidetrack

Apologies, should have made myself clearer. This is my first time reloading ever. I had test chambered some rounds that had been reloaded for me for original barrel and found that the bolt wouldn’t close on the round so my assumption was a tighter chamber. Is that correct?

sort of...either cases are too big or projectiles are sticking out too far....
my old .270 had a chamber cut on the piss...so it WOULDNT chamber neck sized brass worth a damn.... partial length resized for 30 years without issues.