Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Alpine DPT


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 41
Like Tree34Likes

Thread: ideal barrel length for 223, is there a formula?

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    north otago
    Posts
    322

    ideal barrel length for 223, is there a formula?

    is there a formula for barrel length, am not that knolageable about this but a longer barrel make for better accurcy? shooting off the back of a truck so i dont need to worry about the length getting in the way( ie walking through bush would be better with shorter barrel) ive also been told 223 dont have such a "crack" with a longer barrel , and in theory the powder is still burning when the projectile leaves the muzzle so, if you dont need to worry about any restrictions what would the ideal length be for a 223?

  2. #2
    Almost literate. veitnamcam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    24,743
    In theory.

    Shorter barrel =stiffer and more accurate.

    Longer barrel=less muzzle pressure and more quiet.
    "Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.

    308Win One chambering to rule them all.

  3. #3
    Member Marty Henry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tararua
    Posts
    6,605
    Add shorter barrel less velocity
    Longer barrel greater velocity
    I think the "optimum" length is around 16-18 inches, all powder is burned, and the gases are beginning to loose turbulence.

  4. #4
    Member 300CALMAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    NZISTAN
    Posts
    5,214
    Apparently 14.5" was chosen for the M4 based on the need for a compact rifle but saving soldiers hearing. From experience any shorter and a suppressor is mandatory.

  5. #5
    Member rossi.45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Central Otago
    Posts
    1,264
    Google barrel length velocity .223 and plenty will come up . .. . . to me . . . long barrels ( 24-26" ) are for stretching it out varminting . . . short barrels ( 16-22" ) are for light walkabout rifles.

    dont get hung up on velocity, its important but not everything, how the rifle will be used is the decider . . . good luck

    R.
    gadgetman, Micky Duck and Mathias like this.
    without a picture . .. it never happened !

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    2,378
    Quote Originally Posted by 300CALMAN View Post
    Apparently 14.5" was chosen for the M4 based on the need for a compact rifle but saving soldiers hearing. From experience any shorter and a suppressor is mandatory.
    -Any- length .223 barrel is way past the safe zone for hearing unsuppressed. 14.5" is damn short and I'd guess it's the shortest you'd go without excessive loss of velocity. Clearly portability was a primary concern if they chose that length, with hearing damage way down the list.

  7. #7
    Member viper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Rabbitvegas
    Posts
    2,590
    I had a CZ with a 24 inch barel and a tikka with an eighteen inch barrel, both shoot very very well, both suppressed. The rabbits couldn't tell the difference. I don't know if there is a perfect formula.
    Like Rossi said look at what your going to use it for. Believe me lugging a bull barrel 26 inch varmint rifle around the hills is no fun.
    P38, Micky Duck and dannyb like this.

  8. #8
    P38
    P38 is offline
    Member P38's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hastings
    Posts
    5,692
    Can shoot my 16" AR15 very accurately out to 300m - 400m.

    A better marksman could easily shoot it accurately even further.

    I can see big benefits of having a lightweight rifle when shooting from the back of a truck.

    Cheers
    Pete
    Arguing with an Engineer is like Wrestling a Pig in Mud.

    After awhile you realise the Pig loves it.

  9. #9
    JWB
    JWB is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    erehwon
    Posts
    196
    rupert, Shearer and Micky Duck like this.

  10. #10
    Member Mathias's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Canterbury, home of the big Rakaia Red Stag
    Posts
    4,254
    Quote Originally Posted by rossi.45 View Post
    Google barrel length velocity .223 and plenty will come up . .. . . to me . . . long barrels ( 24-26" ) are for stretching it out varminting . . . short barrels ( 16-22" ) are for light walkabout rifles.

    dont get hung up on velocity, its important but not everything, how the rifle will be used is the decider . . . good luck

    R.
    Good words there.
    My walk around varmint 223 has 20" barrel + short suppressor, its a #4 profile barrel, so relatively stiff but not too heavy and I'm happy to carry all day. I chose this length for versatility not velocity.

  11. #11
    GWH
    GWH is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Napier, Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    4,456
    My little model 7 has an 18" Barrel, which seems to be a good balance of short and handy length without too much velocity loss with hand loads.

    Ive shot it very accurately on little steel plates to 600 yards.
    EFriz likes this.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    West of Christchurch
    Posts
    1,678
    And you can handload to take account of length.
    to some degree, cut a couple of inches off a std barrel, no issues. Take it down to 16-18 and add a suppressor to regain 50FPS.
    I'm running 18inch, suppressed and handloads of 2207. Quickload gives me a very high burn rate has been achieve. groups well with 50gr Vmax (12-18mm 5shot group without trying. Fits well across the quad, carries easy.

  13. #13
    Member Beetroot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Morrinsville
    Posts
    2,796
    Quote Originally Posted by birch View Post
    is there a formula for barrel length, am not that knolageable about this but a longer barrel make for better accurcy? shooting off the back of a truck so i dont need to worry about the length getting in the way( ie walking through bush would be better with shorter barrel) ive also been told 223 dont have such a "crack" with a longer barrel , and in theory the powder is still burning when the projectile leaves the muzzle so, if you dont need to worry about any restrictions what would the ideal length be for a 223?
    If you aren't worried about barrel length then go as long as you can, any increase in velocity is an advantage.

    The US military found that the short 14.5" barrel in the M4 was found wanting compared to the 20" of the M16, so some units would stick with the long barrel if they could.
    The only downside to a long barrel is maneuverability and a bit of weight, so if this doesn't matter to you then go as long as you like.
    So to answer the question, like all good questions in life the answer is:

    There is of course a point were a few inches +/- make negligible difference in velocity but have a big impact on maneuverability.
    Need to consider if the extra velocity is worth it too you, if shooting long range and F-class then yes it is, but if hunting under 200m then it won't be beneficial.
    If all the powder isn't being burnt due to a short barrel, then just use a different powder.

    In most rifles a good do everything length is 18"-22", going to the shorter end if using a suppressor.

    It depends.....
    Shearer likes this.

  14. #14
    Member S.E.G's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    217
    This may give you a little insight
    http://ballisticsbytheinch.com/223rifle.html
    birch likes this.

  15. #15
    Member 300CALMAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    NZISTAN
    Posts
    5,214
    Quote Originally Posted by 6x47 View Post
    -Any- length .223 barrel is way past the safe zone for hearing unsuppressed. 14.5" is damn short and I'd guess it's the shortest you'd go without excessive loss of velocity. Clearly portability was a primary concern if they chose that length, with hearing damage way down the list.
    Actually there are a number of theories on why they went to 14.5 inch, remember the Commando was 11.5 inch. Unfortunately they had to fit a 5 inch flash suppressor and the 203 grenade launcher wont fit. If you have ever fired a 11.5 inch version, they are loud even with earmuffs.
    Micky Duck and Dusty Fog like this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. .243 Barrel length, over barrel or forward mount suppressor
    By Strider B in forum Projects and Home Builds
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 14-04-2018, 01:52 PM
  2. Minimum legal barrel length and overall length for firearms
    By A.J.P. in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: 27-07-2015, 12:30 PM
  3. 7 Rem Mag - barrel length
    By Gibo in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 24-06-2015, 02:27 PM
  4. best barrel length for a .308 ?
    By dale in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 12-08-2014, 08:26 AM
  5. 308 barrel length
    By Hunty1 in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 12-10-2013, 08:24 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!