Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

ZeroPak Alpine


User Tag List

Like Tree7969Likes

Thread: 223 on deer

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member Micky Duck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Geraldine
    Posts
    25,542
    oldschool....whats happened here,is in your ignorance/quest for information ,you have insulted a LOT of people by implying they are risking wounding animals....
    your last line above...has nobody ever told you that assumption is the mother of all fuckups????
    if you dont know,you dont know...thats part of the reason this thread is here..so you can read it and learn.
    the guy in sport shop is correct..you would be better off with a .308 to shoot deer...NOBODY will deny that...but by same token if your recoil shy you would possibly be better off with .223 you still have to follow the rules,get in close enough and put right TYPE of projectile in right place...
    you have two options with .222--223 etc either use fragile and go for head neck or crease and hope it blows a big enough area of damage to knock out animal /disable enough vitals to put it down quickly..or something harder and poke it through vital bits and hopefully break a shoulder if not two.... the heavy weights can do that with ease as can monos BUT you still got to put that tiny wee bit of metal in the right place.
    I know people who regularly shoot deer with .22 magnum and others who use a 17 to do the same.... would I recomend it??? hell NO but they are surpurb markmen and are in range of undisturbed animals or animals are in spotlight or thermal scope.... do they occasionally have a cock up??? yip but will be into the follow up shots to disable animal bloody quick as can use semiauto in those tiny cartridges..private land pest control...
    the thing with .308 etc is you CAN load them down to lower levels..eg turn your 308 into a 7.62x39mm or 30/30 for all intents and purposes... lower recoil by lowering projectile weight and/or speed. you cant make a 7.62x39mm into a .308..you can try but cant do it...wont get it fast enough.
    75/15/10 black powder matters

  2. #2
    Member Micky Duck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Geraldine
    Posts
    25,542
    strangley enough a mate did it on red hind with .30/06..she staggered and stood there after turning around so I shot with .270..same effect,she then fell over..both our shots missed bone.2" apart in and out hole on both sides of her neck. base of neck better option but Im usually a take out he front wheels type of guy. the only time I can recal head shooting a deer..yearling red,son had just shot its mate and another mate was also nearby,If I missed it had 2x 308s ready to drop it,I was sitting with my zastava in hands so head shot it.
    75/15/10 black powder matters

  3. #3
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    9,994
    You don't have to do anything different with a .223 than with any other cartridge if you load decent bullets. Shoot the animal in the big important organs up the front, through the shoulder if you like. It dies.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    NI
    Posts
    13,559
    Shot 4 deer with the 60 grain Hammer Hunter last evening. 3100 fps. Ranges 150 - 230 yards. All shoulder/chest shot and all pass throughs. 3 of them big lumps of red spikers. One shot each and only one ran (35 yards). Impressive. Expensive too.

    You don't get the petal damage around the exit like you do with the bigger caliber Hammers but I guess that its going on inside 'cos its pretty gooey in there.

    Name:  IMG_8227.jpeg
Views: 708
Size:  5.86 MB

    Name:  IMG_8230.jpeg
Views: 694
Size:  5.34 MB
    Exit

    Name:  IMG_8241.jpeg
Views: 686
Size:  4.49 MB

    Name:  IMG_8242.jpeg
Views: 693
Size:  5.66 MB
    Last edited by Tahr; 12-06-2023 at 09:27 AM.
    Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing, and right-doing, there is a field. I will meet you there.
    - Rumi

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2022
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    1,853
    Quote Originally Posted by Tahr View Post
    Shot 4 deer with the 60 grain Hammer Hunter last evening. 3100 fps. Ranges 150 - 230 yards. All shoulder/chest shot and all pass throughs. 3 of them big lumps of red spikers. One shot each and only one ran (35 yards). Impressive. Expensive too.

    You don't get the petal damage around the exit like you do with the bigger caliber Hammers but I guess that its going on inside 'cos its pretty gooey in there.

    Attachment 226371

    Attachment 226372
    Exit

    Attachment 226373

    Attachment 226374
    Nice work

    Sent from my CPH2145 using Tapatalk

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Hastings
    Posts
    2,940
    Quote Originally Posted by Tahr View Post
    Shot 4 deer with the 60 grain Hammer Hunter last evening. 3100 fps. Ranges 150 - 230 yards. All shoulder/chest shot and all pass throughs. 3 of them big lumps of red spikers. One shot each and only one ran (35 yards). Impressive. Expensive too.

    You don't get the petal damage around the exit like you do with the bigger caliber Hammers but I guess that its going on inside 'cos its pretty gooey in there.

    Attachment 226371

    Attachment 226372
    Exit

    Attachment 226373

    Attachment 226374
    Comparison test?

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    NI
    Posts
    13,559
    Quote Originally Posted by TeRei View Post
    Comparison test?
    Not enough use to truly compare really. But on a price/effectiveness ratio the Targex 69, 74 and 80 win. All less than half the price of the Hammers and all kill well. The Targex leave good wound channels but seldom exit although the 80's sometimes do. The 60 Hammers' all exited (I like that). The best wound channels and killing of all that I use are with the 77 Sierra Tipped but they are a bit spendy too, but not like the Hammers for price.

    Overall I dont think the Hammers are worth the cost in the .223 but if you want penetration and ensured kills they are probably right up there - especially on bigger reds. You dont seem to quite get the petal churn with these smaller Hammers like the bigger caliber ones do. Ive still got 80 or so left so will keep using them and keep reporting. Its all interesting and fun.
    Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing, and right-doing, there is a field. I will meet you there.
    - Rumi

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    315
    Has anyone tried the cutting edge 60gr raptors or 78gr MHTs?

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Manawatu
    Posts
    1,062
    Haven’t heard of anyone using them. The 78’s will need a 1-7” twist barrel and I don’t imagine they (.223s with 1-7” twist barrel) are very common.

  10. #10
    Member 300CALMAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    NZISTAN
    Posts
    5,291
    Quote Originally Posted by Hunter_Nick View Post
    Haven’t heard of anyone using them. The 78’s will need a 1-7” twist barrel and I don’t imagine they (.223s with 1-7” twist barrel) are very common.
    1:8 should do 77's etc
    ‘Facts don’t care about your feelings’


  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Manawatu
    Posts
    1,062
    Quote Originally Posted by 300CALMAN View Post
    1:8 should do 77's etc
    Not solid copper ones…. Manufacturer states 1-7” required

  12. #12
    Member Micky Duck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Geraldine
    Posts
    25,542
    there just about is niche there for blunt monos.like the 30/30 ones so a reasonably heavy projectile will still stabalise in lesser twist..yes I know compromise will be lesser BC and will slow down quickly..but would allow a more heavy pill to be used up close....
    75/15/10 black powder matters

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Hastings
    Posts
    2,940
    The obvious clue is that for you the heavier pills are doing better? Interesting.

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    NI
    Posts
    13,559
    Quote Originally Posted by TeRei View Post
    The obvious clue is that for you the heavier pills are doing better? Interesting.
    Yes. 70-80 grn seem to be the sweet spot - for me anyway. Monos can be a bit lighter. Contingent on barrel twist.

    Im doing a goat cull early next week and will try a few Hammers on them - damned expensive culling.
    Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing, and right-doing, there is a field. I will meet you there.
    - Rumi

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Hastings
    Posts
    2,940
    Also on your calculations 3/4 of your best are NZ rollies. Who said kiwi made aint good. Happy culling. Done 200 Hammers. Yet to try. Going sightseeing next week. Might take a couple. Best.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Deer 1 & 2
    By Scott29er in forum The Magazine
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 19-02-2020, 07:33 PM
  2. First deer film of 2018, 300 NM & 3 deer
    By Norway in forum The Magazine
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-01-2018, 01:21 PM
  3. little bit of deer
    By sneeze in forum Photography and Video
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 13-12-2012, 06:03 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!