Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

DPT Terminator


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast
Results 91 to 105 of 132
Like Tree116Likes

Thread: Sako 85 Finnlight II

  1. #91
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    778
    Quote Originally Posted by gimp View Post
    @ChrisW what is a real actual measured weight for a .260 or 6.5CM Finnlight 2 or just the S action Finnlight2 stock?
    6.5cm with 20.4" barrel weighs 2.95kg according to our shop scales

  2. #92
    Gone but not forgotten
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    4,129
    That’s pretty similar to my 260 Finnlight I, 3.1 kg including bolt, empty mag and 30mm optilocks (no scope). Optilocks were 140g iirc so would be 2.96 kg without them.
    I like the idea of the adjustable comb on the II.

  3. #93
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    778
    Yes the stock is much stiffer than the original Finnlight & has the adjustable cheek piece. Its not significantly lighter, but its a much better stock, imo.

  4. #94
    Member deepsouthaussie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Invercargill
    Posts
    1,381
    Finnlight II are also available in Left handed actions. This is somewhat appealing from Sako. Not many high quality factory stainless synthetic rifles out there for us Southpaws.

  5. #95
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    80
    South paw 6.5cm
    Name:  4713FEF4-D139-450F-B5CC-DF718C061149.jpeg
Views: 1470
Size:  517.3 KB
    Philipo, KiwiinSeattle and hotsoup like this.

  6. #96
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Hastings
    Posts
    687
    Nice rifle. How’s it shoot?

  7. #97
    Member deepsouthaussie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Invercargill
    Posts
    1,381
    Quote Originally Posted by BruntyHunt View Post
    South paw 6.5cm
    Attachment 106194
    Dammnnnn Son! That's a lovely setup right there.

    Sent from my RNE-L22 using Tapatalk

  8. #98
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    80
    Shoots like a 85 should although still early days to really give a critical review. Fits like a glove in the shoulder, we’ll balenced and the adjustable comb is actually more useful than I thought. The rubber grippy things are good and more solid than the finnlight I grippy things. My only real annoyance is that the bolt handle isn’t Cerakoted which is an oversight in the design, although easily fixed.
    Boaraxa likes this.

  9. #99
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Hastings
    Posts
    687
    I’ve got a sako carbonlight in 260. It’s shoots real well and has a 3.5-10x40 vx3i cds on it. 7lbs suppressed. The finnlight 2 with the cheek piece looks the bizzo for sure.

  10. #100
    Gone But Not Forgotten
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    1,887
    Does anyone else have a Finnlight II and would care to share their impressions of it?

  11. #101
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    917
    I have one in 300wsm with a set trigger. It is a fantastic gun and shoots bloody well. (needed to as i dropped back from a Blaser) Balance is good and the finish of the cerakote is great. Im not sold on the new grips, but the cheek piece is comfortable and well designed.
    No play or rattle in it

  12. #102
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    80
    Had mine out on 5-6 hunts now. Some comments below:

    Accuracy: Its an 85 and shoots like an 85 should.

    Finish: Cerakote is real nice, only time will tell on its robustness. HOWEVER, Sako didn't Cerakote the bolt handle AND the bolt body is not stainless. This is a let down for a rifle advertised as the ducks nuts for all weather. Easy job to Cerakote the bolt handle but cant do anything about the bolt body. Shame on you Sako for that oversight, now I gotta make sure that bolt doesn't rust on extended hunts which is a pain.
    I will also need to Cerakote the button that moves the adjustable stock piece as its rusted.

    Stock: Its stiff as fuk with the carbon fiber bedding which has to be a good thing. I like the rubber grippy things, real sticky even when wet and appear to be more robust than the Finn I grippy things. Fibreglass component of the stock does scratch quite easily. For me I dont care, its a tool, not a show piece. The adjustable stock is real nice and I do use it. It has no play in it at all which is nice.

    Balance: Spot on for me with a VX3 mounted on it.

    Cool factor: looks pretty sweet I reckon.

    Cost: who cares if your a lefty you take what you can get (in the higher end range)

    Overall: Awesome rifle but let down on the weather proofing of the bolt.
    Boaraxa likes this.

  13. #103
    Gone But Not Forgotten
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    1,887
    Thanks guys, I'm considering buying one tomorrow.

  14. #104
    Gone But Not Forgotten
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    1,887
    Quote Originally Posted by BruntyHunt View Post
    ...

    Overall: Awesome rifle but let down on the weather proofing of the bolt.
    Plenty of rifles with a stainless bolt handle but didn't know there were rifles with a SS bolt body.

    Bought a Finnlight II in .308 today. Nice rifle.
    Philipo, gadgetman and ChrisW like this.

  15. #105
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    1,952
    I'm pretty sure the bolt body on my 85 SS is stainless. Never a spot of rust on it.
    The only rust I've seen is on bedding screws threads and under the optilocks.
    My stock fills up with water when used for a support pole river crossing then runs out through the action when held horizontally. Again, "shame sako".
    We note these minor problems critically in a constructive spirit because the overall package is so good and we "expect perfection" . Still it's better than almost every other rifle I see (including the fantastically engineered but too complex blaser in my opinion and also the older sako vixen for comparison).

    Thanks for the comments on the adjustable cheek piece. That's an imperfexion in my 85SS.
    BruntyHunt likes this.

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!