Thread: Mail order firearm loophole??????????

Originally Posted by Koshogi

We have already seen that with their current form, which even asks for the type of firearm, ammunition purchased is to be used in.

The form even says that "only a Police S43a will satisfy the requirements of the Arms Act". The last time they attempted to reinterpreted the law (check your butts), they were put in their place by the magistrate. Could another attempt now be considered contempt of court?

I don't have any problem using the Police s43a. It makes sense to me. However, I do object to requiring information that is not a legal requirement.

I've already had to deal with an AO who believed the form had to be fully completed. Thankfully other AOs had a better understanding of what the requirements actually are.



Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk

Where in the legislation does it outline what information is required?