How about this one...
Sweeping generalisation not supported by available evidence, looks like an outlandish claim to me. It may be your opinion and you're entitled to that, but it will go down better if you don't try to present it as a fact.
What's this 'ideal world' rubbish?
These claims of yours are outlandish (just plain wrong):
Not EVERYBODY came to that realisation. Some more reasonable people would've figured out that ANY firearm is not safe in the hands of someone with serious mental health issues.
MSSAs are NOT made for 'war and killing en-mass' - they lack the full auto functionality of a modern military rifle.
NZ is a great place to lawfully use a semi-auto 7.62, or any other cal, MSSA or not. NZ DOES need them. The Police and the NZDF for obvious reasons. But if by 'NZ' you mean NZers, for private use, then there's plenty of useful stuff an individual doesn't NEED.
You keep changing the terminology you use. You've said MSSAs, semi-auto 7.62, semi-auto military type, and military rifles. They're different things, and there's different rules for each. Please clarify which type of firearm, or which set of features you have a problem with an A-cat FAL holder using.
We had a firearms register, it did nothing to solve or reduce crime, so it was binned. Same thing has been found in other countries, such as Canada. Evidence-based policy making. More govts should try it in more areas.
You are advocating for tighter rules, yet feel safer in NZ than Oz, with its more restrictive gun laws. Doesn't make sense.
Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk
Bookmarks